Vos says armed citizens can defend against shooters; stats show that is rare

Print More

Coburn Dukehart/Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism

Lauren Fitzgerald, 14, from Middleton High School, carries a sign in the Capitol to protest gun violence at a rally on March 14, 2018. Amidst calls for tighter gun restrictions, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, addressed the notion of self-defense in a February claim, stating, “I certainly believe there are an awful lot of folks who are law-abiding who have done nothing wrong who could probably defend themselves.” The Observatory found his claim mostly false.

Mostly False

Following the Feb. 14 mass shooting at Florida’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School that left 17 dead, Wisconsin lawmakers faced pressure on gun control.

Amidst calls for tighter gun restrictions, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, addressed the notion of self-defense in a February claim, stating, “I certainly believe there are an awful lot of folks who are law-abiding who have done nothing wrong who could probably defend themselves.”

The Observatory contacted Vos and his spokesperson for comment, but they did not respond.

Data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Pew Research Center, the Violence Policy Center and the National Bureau of Economic Research illustrate that instances of citizens using firearms for self-defense are uncommon and that proliferation of guns has led to more violent crime — not less.

In a 2017 survey of current and former U.S. gun owners, Pew found that a large majority of citizens in both groups never used a firearm to defend themselves, their families or possessions. It found 17 percent of all gun owners surveyed said they had used a firearm for self-defense.

Meanwhile, BJS findings from its 2013 report on firearm violence indicate that Americans rarely use guns in instances of self-defense.

Using data from 2007 to 2011, BJS found that guns are not used in self-defense or as a threat in 99.2 percent of violent attacks in the United States. Of the 29.6 million instances of violent crime, 43.8 percent of victims offered no type of resistance while 26.2 percent of them resorted to non-confrontational tactics.

In terms of self-protective threats or attacks, 22 percent did so without a weapon, while 0.8 percent used firearms.

Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, is seen at the State of the State address at the Wisconsin Capitol on January 24, 2018. Statistics show that arming citizens is an ineffective strategy for combating gun violence, contradicting Vos' claim that armed citizens can probably defend themselves.

In 2017, the Violence Policy Center, citing FBI statistics, said that in 2015, there were 328 justifiable homicides committed by private citizens. The report went on to say, “While firearms are at times used by private citizens to kill criminals, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that the most common scenarios of lethal gun use in America in 2015, the most recent final data available, are suicide (22,018), homicide (12,979), or fatal unintentional injury (489).”

Additionally, a 2017 report for the National Bureau of Economic Research by Stanford Law Professor John Donohue found that 10 years after states enacted right-to-carry concealed firearm laws “violent crime is substantially higher … than would have been the case had the RTC law not been adopted.” Donohue’s study examined 33 states, including Wisconsin, that passed RTC between 1981 and 2014. Wisconsin passed its concealed carry law in 2011.

His findings show that violent crime rates were higher in RTC states than rates in non-RTC states. Depending on how it is measured, Donohue found that in 31 states with 10 or more years of data, RTC laws were associated with an average increase of between 12.3 percent and 14.3 percent in violent crime.

Donohue’s report also illustrates that guns as a means of American self-defense are somewhat ineffective. He cited a study by the FBI which looked at 160 incidents involving active shooters. It found that nine law enforcement officers were killed and 28 injured in 21 of the 45 instances in which officers engaged in shootouts.

Recent mass shootings at Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and in Parkland involved armed on- or off-duty police officers who either did not engage the shooter or shot at the perpetrator but failed to stop him.

The FBI study found one instance of a civilian stopping a shooter, but that civilian was an active-duty Marine.

“In any event, the use of a gun by a concealed carry permit holder to thwart a crime is a statistically rare phenomenon,” Donohue states in the report.

Rating: Mostly False

Vos’ trust in the public to defend against an active shooter is misguided. While there are instances in which an armed citizen uses a weapon to stop a mass shooter, the higher violent crime rates among right-to-carry states after 10 years indicates that less restrictive gun laws contribute to more violent crime. And statistics show that arming citizens is an ineffective strategy for combating gun violence.

Sources:
The Cap Times, Wisconsin Assembly rejects background check bill, offers funds for armed school guards, Feb. 20, 2018
Pew Research Center, America’s Complex Relationship With Guns, June 22, 2017
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Firearm Violence 1993-2011, May 2013
Violence Policy Center, When Men Murder Women, September 2017
National Bureau of Economic Research, Right to Carry Laws and Violent Crime, January 2018
Vox, Multiple armed officers hung back during Florida school shooting, reports say, Feb. 25, 2018
FactCheck.org, Orlando Club Had Armed Security, June 16, 2016
NRA Institute for Legislative Action, Gun Controllers Choose to Ignore Cases of Good Guys with Guns, Nov. 17, 2017

Comments are closed.